Skip to main content


Anyone know what the fuck this meathead is talking about? Maybe it says more about me than them that they've managed to piss me off and live rent-free in my head with this one gormless post.
in reply to Comrade Ferret

it's either an XKCD 2071 moment or just them inventing a guy to be mad about (or, alternatively, had the displeasure of encountering a "MAGA communist"
in reply to Cysio ​

Right, I forgot those exist. Had to look up xkcd 2071, but that would still imply that they actually came into contact with people like this. MAGA communists notwithstanding (which I should hope anyone should be able to detect), I just don't believe that.

But maybe. I guess them not being able to detect them would explain why they think MLs support Putin.

in reply to Comrade Ferret

honestly I try not to listen to anarkid strawmen about communists, just block
in reply to Cysio ​

That's fair, it just really came outta left field when I was already in a bad mood and wanted to be sure I wasn't losing my mind.
in reply to Comrade Ferret

ribbing MLs for having strongman shit in common with other authoritarians, of course
in reply to Sally Strange

Not sure why you would want to do that, or why you would agree with that sentiment. I'm pretty disappointed.

For the future: People who disagree on literally everything, and make one another out to be sworn enemies, don't have anything worth noting in common. MLs don't have strongmen any more than any other progressives do. We don't like Stalin because he was "tough"; if you keep your eyes out, we tend to fight against the propaganda that he was some sort of brute and instead talk about his philosophy, writings, economic and diplomatic strategy, and antifascism. The fact that he was a poet and doodled wolves in the margins of his speech notes. That he became horribly depressed when Germany invaded, and refused to leave Moscow when it was at risk of being encircled. No one thinks Stalin was amazing because he trounced his opposition and oppressed people. So what other so-called strongmen would you associate us with?

cy reshared this.

in reply to Comrade Ferret

Um Lenin? It's in the name? I don't understand why you're disappointed; surely you don't expect all your internet acquaintances to agree with MLism.
in reply to Sally Strange

You can disagree. I disagree with anarchists. You don't see me sharing stuff dunking on them, because as it stands, we're on the same team. And I have never heard of Lenin being described as a strongman before.
in reply to Comrade Ferret

well that's nice of you but for the record you totally can dunk on anarchists, who can be ridiculous and inadvertently hilarious sometimes. What I said about Lenin is that he was a personal power monger. And that MLs have strongman shit going on.
in reply to Sally Strange

And you're wrong, and to push that is to push the same western propaganda that's been pushed since the start of the Cold War. It's to run defence for social democrats through to neoliberals. This isn't the same as finding your allies inadvertently hilarious.

Imagine if, for instance, I compared anarchists to Elon Musk because they're both libertarians, or something. You probably wouldn't even know where to begin with that amount of bullshit, and it wouldn't be funny, it would just be divisive.

in reply to Comrade Ferret

mmm well that does sound annoying. But also silly because, like, it's me. I'm the anarchist. When it comes right down to it, I just disrespect Lenin the same way I disrespect Obama and Putin and Trump and Lula and every single one of them. Sorry not sorry, that's part of the package. I'm not shit talking you, I'm laughing at an insult towards Lenin. Frankly it's probably healthy for those who embrace leaders that way to have their leaders mocked in front of them.
in reply to Sally Strange

It isn't mockery, it's falsehoods. It isn't silliness, it's spreading western anticommunist propaganda. It's counterrevolution. Lenin is the one who coined self-criticism; we know plenty about taking our leaders to trial and not lionizing anyone. The issue isn't "you said mean things about the guy I like", it's how horribly false it is, how damaging it is, and how relevant it is for that insult to be a comparison to the modern world's most powerful fascist. It's very fucked up, and if that's your idea of doing what's politically right, then you may as well join up with the MAGA communists, because, ironically, you're saying the exact same things they are.
in reply to Sally Strange

@Sally Strange @Comrade Ferret Why are you siding with liberal anti-communists even if you can get an own in on MLs? That lib would easily throw you under the bus just the same

Btw what is a strongman to you and what does Trump have in common with Lenin? To me, they don't rly have anything in common

Although..... okay okay, it is a fact that Lenin was rly strong, he was big into lifting hehe

I edited this cuz original was too hostile and I'm tired of internet fighting recently

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Comrade Ferret

From their bio, attached...

Not all anarchists, but man I hope the next American thing to die is COINTELPRO-esque bullshit like this. Pallas may not be a fed, but they've certainly drunk a lot of the Kool-aid to make punching left a central part of their identity.

And that's as much bandwidth as anyone who unironically uses "tankie" to refer to anything other than the 1956 Hungarian counterrevolution can have from me, for now.

in reply to LucyWrambles

Yeah, they repeated that in the conversation before I blocked them for my own sanity. I figured that shit had died in the last few years but apparently, yeah, there's still radlibs out there that think they're fighting the good fight by targeting "tankies".
in reply to Comrade Ferret

@Comrade Ferret Pure lib brain lol, I assume they're referring to foreign aid programs relating to HIV

Email factory NGO mindset - "When there's more western aid, AIDS rates go down, when there's less western aid, AIDS rates go up!!!! Uhhh the "developing world" just...... does that, they just have HIV there. Just how it works......". Just no further analysis there, not only is poverty considered an original condition, so is HIV infection apparently

And tbh..... it also displays a kind of implicit white supremacy, with liberals its always about how we can send OUR money and OUR specialists to help the naturally helpless third world and ofc the actual long-term outcome of aid like that is just an increasing dependency and perpetuation of the imperialist relationship

HIV rates will drop if the American empire stops or at least eases up on the political meddling in the third world lmao. Turns out it's difficult to build a functional medical system when there are CIA-and-USAID-sponsored civil wars and color revolutions happening all the time, particularly when some government wants any kind of escape from the neocolonial world system

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)